TROUT CANYON SUBSTATION

CLARK (NV) · GLW · node key TROUT CANYON · CAISO run date 2026-10-12

Seven questions a developer, lender or counsel asks before filing here. Every figure is a CAISO row; Not public marks what the public files cannot answer and where to get it. Definitions: methodology.

Can you get in?

No official Cluster 16 availability statement names this POI. Absence of a statement is not availability.

Not public: per-constraint transmission headroom at this POI — CAISO's cluster study reports (RIMS login).

Not on this site yet: the zonal transmission-capability table CAISO publishes for cluster scoring — public; the join is planned.

Who is ahead of you?

3,000 MW (n=9)

queued ahead of a new request (legacy + C15)

2,700 MW (n=8)

with an executed interconnection agreement · public report; C15 has no IA yet

0 MW (n=0)

operating at this node

0 MW

Cluster 15 requests seeking full capacity

Not public: who the interconnection customers are (the queue) — CAISO's public files carry project names only; the projects table below is the full public record. EIA-860 names the owners of what already operates nearby, not of what is queued.

Do projects leave after seeing the costs?

3,000 MW (n=9)

received Phase II / Facilities Study results here · any sheet, public report

0 MW (n=0)

of that, withdrew with results in hand

0.00 (n=9)

Phase II attrition (MW share)

Not public: the network upgrade cost allocated to a project here — Phase I / Phase II study reports, served through RIMS. Ask the incumbent developer or request the report; nothing public reconstructs it.

Will you be deliverable?

625 MW (n=2)

2025 TPD requested at this node

0 MW

allocated

625 MW

refused at 0 % — contracted / shortlisted (groups A+B)

0 MW

refused at 0 % — no PPA (group D)

1 / 0

2024 cycle: projects given full / partial capacity

A 0 % in group D is the expected result for an uncontracted project; a 0 % in group A or B is a contracted project that did not get deliverability. Rows are joined through all three sheets, so a request whose project has since withdrawn still appears. CAISO states no reason.

Will the power be worth anything here?

The Local Capacity Technical Report does not name this substation on any area boundary: not encoded, which is not the same as outside every area.

Not on this site yet: day-ahead price history at this POI — CAISO OASIS publishes it; it is shown only for a pricing node confirmed by hand in data/poi_pnodes.csv, and this one is not confirmed yet.

Will the land pass intake?

Intake scoring under the 2023 IPE rewards site control, permitting progress and system need before study begins. Parcel, zoning, Williamson Act and CEC exclusion screens run for Kings and Kern counties (caiso-siting parcels, layers screen); results are in outputs/parcels_*.md for the nodes they were run on and are not yet rendered per node here.

Not public: landowner willingness and option terms — county assessor parcels give ownership class, not intent; owner names are withheld on purpose.

How long, and who gave up?

1,500 MW (n=3)

withdrawn since 2022 (both reports)

1,500 MW

of that, storage

0.54 (n=12)

storage churn · withdrawn storage ÷ queued + operating storage

0.00 (n=3)

Cluster 15 survival · active ÷ (active + withdrawn)

1,500 MW (n=3)

all-time withdrawn since 2006 · mostly wind/solar-era; colour, not signal

2026-12-01 to 2029-06-27

current on-line dates of active projects

Cluster-level time-to-withdrawal curves are on the Survival page; they compare process regimes, not only nodes.

Projects at this node (12)

Both reports. cod = current on-line date (public report) or proposed on-line date (Cluster 15). ia_status exists only in the public report. Cluster 15 deliverability is requested, not allocated.

project_name	queue_position	sheet_status	cluster	net_mw	storage_mw	deliverability	ia_status	cod	withdrawn_date
MOSEY	2148	ACTIVE	C14	500	500	FULL CAPACITY	EXECUTED	2029-06-27
SUNBAKED SOLAR	2149	ACTIVE	C14	500	500	ENERGY ONLY	EXECUTED	2029-02-26
BONANZA PEAK SOLAR FARM	1655	ACTIVE	C12	400	200	FULL CAPACITY	EXECUTED	2027-12-31
PURPLE SAGE ENERGY CENTER	1800	ACTIVE	C13	400	400	FULL CAPACITY	EXECUTED	2028-05-01
LARREA SOLAR	2150	ACTIVE	C14	300	300	ENERGY ONLY		2028-09-15
YELLOW PINE 3	1654	ACTIVE	C12	250	236	PARTIAL CAPACITY	EXECUTED	2026-12-01
CALVADA SPRINGS SOLAR	1798	ACTIVE	C13	250	250	PARTIAL CAPACITY	EXECUTED	2027-12-31
ROUGH HAT HYBRID SOLAR	1650	ACTIVE	C12	200	200	FULL CAPACITY	EXECUTED	2028-12-13
ROUGH HAT 2	1799	ACTIVE	C13	200	200	FULL CAPACITY	EXECUTED	2028-12-13
Borderline Solar	2242	WITHDRAWN	C15	600	600	ENERGY ONLY (REQ)		2028-10-01	2025-05-01
Campito Peak	2211	WITHDRAWN	C15	550	550	FULL CAPACITY (REQ)		2031-12-01	2025-04-28
Cathedral	2309	WITHDRAWN	C15	350	350	FULL CAPACITY (REQ)		2031-12-02	2025-04-29

TPD allocation requests at this node (4)

CAISO Transmission Plan Deliverability allocation results, joined on queue position through all three sheets of the public report (a request whose project has since withdrawn still appears). 2024 rows carry no MW. Groups: A = executed power purchase agreement requiring FCDS, or an LSE serving its own load; B = shortlisted for, or actively negotiating, a power purchase agreement; C = already in commercial operation for the capacity seeking TP deliverability; D = no PPA; electing the Section 8.9.2.3 (financial-security) path.

tpd_year	queue_id	project_name	allocation_group	mw_requested	allocation_pct	mw_allocated	status
2025	2150	LARREA SOLAR	A	125	0%	0	NONE
2025	2149	SUNBAKED SOLAR	B	100	0%	0	NONE
2025	2149	SUNBAKED SOLAR	B	400	0%	0	NONE
2024	2148	MOSEY	A		100%		FCDSA

Geocode provenance

Position is approximate or unknown (county-centroid): position unknown; placed at the median of located nodes in the county.

geo_method: county-centroid
geo_score: 0.30
osm_name: median of located nodes in NV CLARK
lat, lon: 35.79734, -115.01155

All metrics

metric	value	definition
`legacy_active_mw`	3,000	active MW in the public report (C14 and earlier)
`c15_active_mw`	0	active MW in the Cluster 15 report
`operating_mw`	0	completed MW in the public report
`pipeline_storage_mw`	2,786	storage MW inside legacy_active_mw + c15_active_mw
`operating_storage_mw`	0	storage MW inside operating_mw (completed, public report)
`wd_recent_mw`	1,500	withdrawn in the last 5 years (both reports)
`wd_recent_storage_mw`	1,500	storage MW of those rows — each project's storage components capped at its net-to-grid figure; a handful of filings report net-to-grid as 0 and keep the component MW, so this can exceed the row above at 3 nodes.
`wd_post_phase2_mw`	0	withdrew AFTER Phase II / Facilities Study results (public report only)
`p2_reached_mw`	3,000	MW of projects that received Phase II / Facilities Study results here (public report, any sheet)
`p2_withdrawn_mw`	0	of those, MW that then withdrew (== wd_post_phase2_mw)
`p2_attrition`	0.00	p2_withdrawn_mw / p2_reached_mw — share of studied MW that left with results in hand
`committed_mw`	2,700	ACTIVE MW holding an executed interconnection agreement (public report)
`churn_n`	12	projects behind storage_churn (withdrawn recent + queued + operating)
`c15_n`	3	projects behind c15_survival
`p2_n`	9	projects behind p2_attrition
`eia_plants`	0	operable EIA-860 plants within 5 km of the node's mapped position (positioned nodes only)
`eia_nameplate_mw`	0	their nameplate MW, all technologies (EIA-860 Generator file, Operable sheet)
`eia_storage_mwh`	0	battery energy capacity among them (EIA-860 Energy Storage file), as reported
`eia_storage_1h_mw`		storage MW at units whose reported MWh is no more than their MW (one hour or less); shown with 'duration not established' because the value may reflect how the form was filled
`eia_proposed_mw`	0	nameplate MW in EIA-860's Proposed sheet within the same radius (planned / under construction)
`wd_alltime_mw`	1,500	every withdrawn MW since 2006 (includes dead wind/solar-era projects)
`storage_churn`	0.54	wd_recent_storage_mw / (active + operating storage MW) — the one to quote
`churn_alltime`	0.50	wd_alltime_mw / (pipeline + operating MW) — historical color only
`c15_survival`	0.00	c15_active / (c15_active + c15_withdrawn)
`c15_fcds_req_mw`	0	C15 active MW that requested Full Capacity Deliverability Status (requested, not allocated)
`tpd25_projects`	2	projects at the node that sought TPD in CAISO's 2025 allocation cycle
`tpd25_req_mw`	625	MW at the node that sought TPD in CAISO's 2025 allocation cycle
`tpd25_alloc_mw`	0	MW allocated in that cycle (requested × allocation %)
`tpd25_denied_mw`	625	MW requested by rows that received 0 %
`tpd25_unalloc_mw`	625	requested minus allocated: MW refused outright PLUS the remainder left by partial allocations — quote this for 'what the developer did not get'
`tpd25_unknown_mw`	0	MW requested by rows with no allocation percentage in the file; 0 today
`tpd25_req_A_mw`	125	of tpd25_req_mw, requested in allocation group A: executed PPA (or LSE own load)
`tpd25_req_B_mw`	500	of tpd25_req_mw, requested in allocation group B: shortlisted / negotiating a PPA
`tpd25_req_C_mw`	0	of tpd25_req_mw, requested in allocation group C: already in commercial operation
`tpd25_req_D_mw`	0	of tpd25_req_mw, requested in allocation group D: no PPA, Section 8.9.2.3 path
`tpd25_denied_A_mw`	125	of tpd25_denied_mw, refused at 0 % in group A
`tpd25_denied_B_mw`	500	of tpd25_denied_mw, refused at 0 % in group B
`tpd25_denied_C_mw`	0	of tpd25_denied_mw, refused at 0 % in group C
`tpd25_denied_D_mw`	0	of tpd25_denied_mw, refused at 0 % in group D
`tpd25_denied_ppa_mw`	625	refused MW in groups A + B: contracted or shortlisted projects that did not get deliverability; the refusal that matters
`tpd24_fcdsa_projects`	1	projects at the node allocated Full Capacity in the 2024 cycle
`lcr_status`		CAISO Local Capacity Area (Resource Adequacy geography): 'in <area>' or 'outside <area>' as the LCT report's boundary lists state it; blank = not encoded, never 'outside every area'
`lcr_sub_area`		sub-area / load pocket within that area, when the LCT report delineates it
`wdat_active_projects`	0	active WDAT requests at the same substation (WDAT = distribution-level queue at the same substation, PG&E file today; not CAISO deliverability)
`wdat_active_mw`	0	MW of active WDAT (distribution-level) requests at the same substation (PG&E file today)
`wdat_active_storage_mw`	0	storage MW attributed from wdat_active_mw — an assumption: the PG&E file publishes one MW figure per request, so storage-only requests count in full and solar+storage requests count at half (160 of 1,011 active requests carry storage; 362 of their 479 MW is attributed as storage).
`wdat_inservice_mw`	0	WDAT MW already in service at that substation
`wdat_withdrawn_mw`	0	WDAT MW withdrawn at that substation (all-time in the file)
`wdat_ft_over_cap_n`	0	active Fast Track requests above the 5 MW Fast Track ceiling — held out of wdat_active_*
`wdat_ft_over_cap_mw`	0	MW of those held-out rows, as posted; cause not established

No figure on this site states a cause. CAISO files carry no withdrawal reason beyond "IC Request".

Screening tool, not engineering advice. Built from public filings by an engineer who is not a licensed PE. Verify every figure against the source filing named in its row before you rely on it for any decision. No warranty of any kind. Not affiliated with CAISO, EIA, or any utility. No engineering services are offered.